How FamilyFX content is made
FamilyFX covers questions that affect real decisions at home, at school and in healthcare. This page explains who is responsible for the content, how evidence is used and what a review label on an article means.
Who publishes FamilyFX
FamilyFX is published by Neuro FX Ltd. It was created by Paul and Tina Fox, the owners of NeuroFX, as a separate digital support product for families before and after an ADHD or autism diagnosis. FamilyFX provides education and practical support. It is not a clinical service and does not provide individual medical, psychological or legal advice.
Paul leads the product and editorial programme. Tina advises on clinical boundaries and carries out named clinical review where an article says that she has done so. You can read more about Paul, Tina and the relationship with NeuroFX.
How subjects are chosen
The content structure begins with the questions families ask before assessment, while waiting, after diagnosis and as children grow. Each article has one primary question so that a reader can find a direct answer without having to work through a general course. Related articles, topic pages, guides and tools then provide more depth where it is useful.
How evidence is handled
Health, education, benefits and SEND content is checked against sources appropriate to the subject. These may include NICE guidance, NHS information, legislation, government guidance, professional bodies and peer-reviewed research. Sources are listed on the page so readers can inspect the material behind a claim.
Evidence does not always provide one answer for an individual child. FamilyFX keeps the distinction between established guidance, a reasonable interpretation and a practical suggestion. It also avoids promising that a strategy, referral, assessment or application will produce a particular result.
What the author and review labels mean
Most pages are written in the FamilyFX house voice and are attributed to FamilyFX as the publishing organisation. "Reviewed by FamilyFX" records an editorial review against the product's writing, evidence and content standards. It does not mean that a clinician has personally approved the page.
A named clinical, safeguarding, SEND, legal or lived-experience review appears only when that review has been recorded. The reviewer's name and role are shown on the article. The written date records when the article was first drafted for FamilyFX. The publication date records when it became available on the site. Last reviewed shows the most recent recorded check, while next review due is the scheduled date for the next one. We may review an article sooner if guidance or evidence changes.
How writing technology is used
Digital tools support research, drafting, consistency checks, internal linking and site production. They do not decide a diagnosis, replace a clinician or create permission to make unsupported claims. The FamilyFX content specification, evidence requirements and writing standard govern what is published, regardless of which tools helped produce it.
How we write
We write in natural British English, using clear explanations, concrete examples and careful language about what is known and what remains uncertain. We respect the intelligence of parents and young people, and we never assume that children with the same diagnosis will have the same experiences or need the same support. Our aim is to be useful, honest and specific, without generic reassurance or claims that reach beyond the evidence.
Corrections and updates
Guidance, services and processes can change. If you find a factual error, a broken source or wording that no longer reflects the current position, email info@neurofx.co.ukwith the page address and the detail you would like us to check. Material changes are recorded through the page's review and modification information where that information is available.