Is my child refusing, or unable to do what I have asked?
A practical way to distinguish disagreement from a task a child cannot understand, start, tolerate or complete in that moment.

The short answer
Do not try to infer ability from the force of the no. First make the task observable: what action, in what order, with what endpoint? Then check whether your child understood it, can interrupt what they are doing, knows the first step, can hold the sequence, can tolerate the sensory and emotional conditions and has enough capacity now. Offer one small piece of support without changing the necessary outcome. If the child can proceed, you have found part of the access need. If they still cannot, stop adding prompts and investigate the next barrier. A child can also understand, have capacity and disagree. Treat that as disagreement rather than disability, hear the reason and state what remains fixed. The useful question is not whether the child is generally capable. It is which part of this task is available under these conditions, and what response fits the point where access breaks.
- Make the requested action and its endpoint observable before judging the response.
- Check understanding, starting, sequencing, tolerance and present capacity separately.
- Test one useful support rather than testing the child's sincerity with more pressure.
- Treat disagreement as information even when a necessary boundary remains.
- Compare conditions and aftermath, not just whether the task was eventually completed.
You have read your 3 free articles
Continue reading with FamilyFX membership
We keep three articles free so you can see whether FamilyFX is written for you before you pay for anything. Membership opens the full Library, all eight modules, fourteen deep guides, eight practical packs and eight tools for £79.99 a year.
Already a member? Sign in and this page opens straight away.
NeuroFX patients can use an access code for a free first year. Enter it on the join page.
